Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
2 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
3 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
3 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
5 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
6 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
7 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
7 | BLEYMAN David | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
9 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
10 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
11 | ELIN Adam E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
12 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
13 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | |
14 | UH Daniel | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | |
15 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
16 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
17 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
18 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
19 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
20 | HUANG Tom | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
21 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
22 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
23 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
24 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
25 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
26 | MICHNA Colin P. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
27 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 2% | |
27 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | |
29 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
30 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
31 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
32 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
33 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
34 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
35 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
36 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
37 | BRIDGES Benjamin | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
38 | BIDWELL Ryder | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
39 | TANG Charles | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
41 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
42 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - | |
43 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
44 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.