San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 2 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 3 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% |
| 3 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
| 5 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 9% |
| 6 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 7 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 8 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% | 3% |
| 9 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 10 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
| 11 | NG Kenneth | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 12 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 13 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
| 14 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 15 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 16 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 17 | SEEDS Edward T. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | |
| 18 | LI Jett | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 19 | WILT Daniel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 4% |
| 20 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 24% | 2% |
| 21 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% | |
| 22 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | |
| 23 | WHITE Austin M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
| 24 | HUSSAIN Ismail A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 7% |
| 26 | HUSSAIN Ibrahim | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | RANJITH Yash M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 28 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | |
| 29 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 30 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 31 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 32 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 33 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 34 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 35 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | KHER Roan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 37 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
| 38 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 39 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 40 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 89% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | CHU Colin | 100% | 82% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | YU Leo | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 43 | HE Bu Wei O. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 44 | HIGHTOWER Palmer | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | GETSIN Anthony | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 46 | LIN Richard | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | WACHTEL Oliver | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | GERA Kaveer | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | BACHER Richard | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | FLIGOR William | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 52 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 53 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 54 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 56 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 57 | MIN Lucas | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 59 | BUFIY Aeneas | 100% | 94% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 60 | MANDAL Souptik | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 61 | LIU William | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 62 | BOUCHARD Kai | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | BHARDWAJ Kush | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 66 | ZHOU Aiden | 100% | 82% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 67 | BHARDWAJ Kayshav | 100% | 88% | 36% | 6% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.