San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CASASSOVICI Georges | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | |
| 2 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 3 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 3 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 5 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 6 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 7 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 8 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 9 | ZWICKER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 10 | LAU Christian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 11 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 12 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 13 | YU Austin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | HOGE William P. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | BROOKS Rowan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | WANG William | 100% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | LAI Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 19 | GULCHIN Sam | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 20 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 21 | LIU Noah | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | BUEHLMANN Johann | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | WANG Robert | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 24 | RICHARDS Andrew | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 2% | |
| 25 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 98% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | ULFARSSON Hawk | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | OYANG Tyler | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 28 | NG Biwon | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | TING Gracin | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | CHENG Trevor | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 32 | KAMRA Jai | 100% | 97% | 70% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.