Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HANSEN Jonas B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 2 | JONES Tristan Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 56% |
| 3 | MECHKOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 3 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 5 | PICARD christopher (Chris) W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 6 | YU Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 7 | ADAMIAN Nathaniel S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | |
| 8 | JIN Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 9 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
| 10 | SUMLER Jeffery | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% | |
| 11 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% | 1% |
| 12 | CHARRON Jack | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 13 | MCDERMOTT Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 14 | MACZIK Adam W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 15 | ABELE Chris | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 16 | RUSSELL Edward | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 17 | PAGE Andrew (Drew) (Drew) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% |
| 18 | BOYNTON Zachariah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 19 | ROEMER Peter A. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 20 | MULLARKEY Edward (Ed) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 21 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 22 | LANGTON Sawyer | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | PATENAUDE Kameron | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 24 | ZHENG Hagen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
| 25 | THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 26 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
| 27 | MACKIN Samuel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 28 | ADAMIAN David | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 29 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 1% |
| 30 | PARDO Sarah | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 31 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | YU Weizhen | 100% | 96% | 66% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | WICKEN Baylee S. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 34 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 35 | PAGE Duncan | 100% | 86% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | BELLIVEAU Shane | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | VINE Melissa | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 38 | DUFFY Gerald | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | LUO Peter | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | MATEI Daniel | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | PARTE Aidan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 44 | SHICK Alexander | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 45 | CAFASSO Martin | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 46 | JENSEN MJ | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | MCMAHON Kathleen M. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | 100% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | CAFASSO Sabrina | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | MCELROY Sierra R. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | PESTEY Alli K. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | PRICE Skye | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.