Orlando, FL - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
2 | JITTAN daniel | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 82% | |
3 | GATZA Logan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 42% | 49% | |
3 | MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
5 | SAGE Michael J. | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 12% | |
6 | LOVE Aaron | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
7 | ZHENG zhe | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
8 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
9 | DERBAUM Ryan | - | - | 1% | 12% | 49% | 37% | |
10 | DEGROOT Blake | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
11 | GIBBS Grant N. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
12 | HEARN Christen J. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | - |
13 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 49% | 41% | |
14 | LONG Connor M. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
15 | ROSE Ben | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 1% | |
16 | ROSS III Paul D. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% | |
17 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
18 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 2% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% | - | |
19 | WANG Winston | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - | |
20 | BUCHENHORST Anton | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | - | |
21 | REYES Manuel A | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
22 | VIANNA Guilherme | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
23 | TANG Albert | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
24 | LEE Jacob | - | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
25 | ARIZA Abraham J. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
26 | RIVERA IVAN | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | - | |
27 | HOGGARD Carson | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
28 | LAKATIS Jake | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
29 | QUINTERO Julian | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
30 | KHAN Ahyaan | 1% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
31 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
32 | PAN Henry | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
33 | HUANG Eythan | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
34 | HUANG Justin | 33% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
35 | CABRERA Isaac | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
36 | LEE Lukas | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
37 | RODRIGUEZ Jr. Jorge | 6% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 3% | - | |
38 | FORSYTH Patrick | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
39 | ANAND Aayush | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
40 | HITT Aiden | 4% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
41 | EMILIANI Andres | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
42 | KIM Matthew | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
43 | BATRA Dev | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
44 | CHEN Junxuan | 14% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
45 | CUNANAN Ethan | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.