Orlando, FL - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 2 | JITTAN daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | |
| 3 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% | |
| 3 | MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 5 | SAGE Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 12% | |
| 6 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 7 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 8 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 9 | DERBAUM Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 37% | |
| 10 | DEGROOT Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
| 11 | GIBBS Grant N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 12 | HEARN Christen J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | - |
| 13 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 41% | |
| 14 | LONG Connor M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 15 | ROSE Ben | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 1% | |
| 16 | ROSS III Paul D. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% | |
| 17 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 18 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | WANG Winston | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | BUCHENHORST Anton | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 21 | REYES Manuel A | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 22 | VIANNA Guilherme | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | ARIZA Abraham J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 26 | RIVERA IVAN | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% | - | |
| 27 | HOGGARD Carson | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 28 | LAKATIS Jake | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | QUINTERO Julian | 100% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | KHAN Ahyaan | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 32 | PAN Henry | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | HUANG Justin | 100% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | CABRERA Isaac | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 36 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 37 | RODRIGUEZ Jr. Jorge | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | FORSYTH Patrick | 100% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | ANAND Aayush | 100% | 86% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | HITT Aiden | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | EMILIANI Andres | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | BATRA Dev | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | CHEN Junxuan | 100% | 86% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | CUNANAN Ethan | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.