Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BLYTH Jourdain L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 2 | SHUGART Henry R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | |
| 3 | ALAIMO Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 3 | CHERIS Zachariah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | |
| 5 | REES Daniel I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 6 | CELECKI Barrett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 7 | BRANDRETH Garret | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 17% | |
| 8 | WALSH Kevin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 9 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | |
| 10 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 13% | |
| 11 | EBELL Ivan D. | 100% | 84% | 37% | 7% | - | - | |
| 11 | KAJI Ty | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 13 | SOLTER Kai | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | TSUEI Marcus | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
| 15 | COLE Matthew | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | LUNA MARTINEZ Luis | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | BARON Sabina | 100% | 98% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 19 | BUVARP Elisabeth M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 20 | GOLDMAN Rami | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 28% | 2% |
| 21 | VAUGHN Matthew (Manny) E. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 22 | EYMAN Hans | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% | |
| 23 | ZHOU Jiasheng | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | BURCH Tristan H. | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 25 | LI Patrick | 100% | 88% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | TIBBETTS Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | LOGUE Andrew E. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | KISSINGFORD John F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 29 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | 3% | |
| 30 | KRUGER Mark | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | COFFEY Jacob | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 34 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | MILLER Veronica | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 36 | DAVIS Emma | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | DAVIS Greg | 100% | 54% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | TORRES Nicolas | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.