USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Junior Men's Saber

Saturday, February 29, 2020 at 8:00 AM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Results

Reset

Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FRISHMAN Ethan J. V V V V V D V V V V V V 4.9 5 +0.1
2 WOOD Elden S. V V V D D V V V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
3 BENAVRAM Lev C. V D V V D V V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
3 ZU Kevin V V V V V D V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
5 NADILE Henry V. V V V V D V V V V D 5.0 5 -
6 BARNETT Adam V D V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
7 MIKA Casper V V V D V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
8 BASALYGA Jeffrey V V V D V D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
9 SINGER Carson V V D V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
10 MORREALE John V V D V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
11 QUAN Nicholas V V V V D V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
12 ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. V V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
13 HAMMER Peter A. V V D D V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
14 KIM Avery J. D D V V V V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
15 SHI Andrew D V V V D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
16 LINSKY Matthew D D D V D D V V V D 3.8 1 -2.8
17 ZHOU Matthew R. V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
18 LAI Adam J. V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
19 CHAMBERS Amir E. V V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
20 KIM Minwook D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
21 ZHOU Kevin V V V D V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
22 LO Joshua H. V V V D V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
23 LEE Kyle V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
24 YAO Jonathan V V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
25 GANTA Vijay V V D V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
26 CHAN Matthew D V V V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
27 CHO Brandon V V V D V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
28 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. V V D V D V V D 4.1 3 -1.1
29 LIU kelly V D V V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
30 BARTOLO Domenic V. D D V V D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
31 DODRILL Grant D D V D V V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
32 STEINMETZ John V D D D V D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
33 JEAN Noe T. V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
34 LAHOTSKA Yahor V V V V V D D 3.9 5 +1.1
35 LIN William D V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
36 MORRILL Justin V V D V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
37 CHEN Oscar D V V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
37 QIU Le V V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
39 ERACHSHAW Taras P. V D V V V D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
40 HAMMERSTROM Jared D V V V V D V D 3.8 4 +0.2
41 RAI Avin D V V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
42 DENNER Maximilian P. D D V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
43 HUDDY Brandon J. D V V D V V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
44 ZHOU Justin D V D V V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
45 MORRILL William V V D D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
46 CHANG Eliot A. V D V D D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
47 HOUTZ Jackson V D V D V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
48 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. V D D V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
49 WOODWARD Dylan P. V D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
50 YANG Richard D D V D V V D 2.0 2 -
51 YEN Preston D D D V V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
52 COLE Alexander V D D D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
53 GINIS Nathan D D V D V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
53 ALTIRS Alexander D D D V D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
55 QIN Alexander D D V V D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
56 JARAMILLO Tobias L. D V D D V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
57 CHIN Matthew W. D D D D V V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
58 HUANG Tyler T. D D V V D D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
59 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. V D D V D D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
60 NOBLE Colin V D D D V D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
61 LEE Jude H. D D D D V V D 1.3 1 -0.3
62 BERMAN Luca D D D D D V V D 2.3 1 -1.3
63 GREENBAUM Ian L. D D V D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
64 KOGAN Benjamin D V D D D D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
65 CHEONG Heonjae V D V V V D D 2.4 4 +1.6
66 WIND Nicky E. V D V V D V D 4.3 4 -0.3
67 HUSSAIN Faaris V V V D V D D 3.9 4 +0.1
68 TONG Qilin V V D D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
69 WILSON Jude D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
70 KENNEDY Liam A. V V D V D D 1.8 3 +1.2
71 LEONARD Cole D V V V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
72 NG Jonathan H. V V D V D D D 3.6 3 -0.6
73 REN Richard D V D D V V D 0.9 3 +2.1
74 FLORES Peter D. D V V V D D D 3.2 3 -0.2
75 BUKOWSKI Bronson V D D V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
76 RABINKOV Anthony V V V D D D D 3.3 3 -0.3
77 WOODWARD Connor D V V D V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
78 PAN Andrew W. D D V D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
79 GHENEA George Philipe V V D V D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
80 GILES Jeremy M. D V V D V D D 4.0 3 -1.0
81 PANDEY Neil D V D V V D D 1.1 3 +1.9
82 LU Timothy D D V D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
83 GILMORE Thomas W. V D V D V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
84 SIMAK Joseph P. V V D D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
85 WUN William V D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
86 JIANG Kevin V D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
87 EPSTEIN Henry N. D V D V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
88 DIACOS Jordan V D D D V D D 3.8 2 -1.8
89 ZHOU Miles V V D D D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
90 HARGENRADER Kailen A. D V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
91 NIL Michael Y. D V D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
92 HONG Steven D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
93 GRASS James D. D D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
94 NEVILLE James D D D D D V D 0.9 1 +0.1
95 LEDERER Justin W. D D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
96 CHAVES Matthew J. D D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
96 KEEFE Duncan D D V D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
98 LEE Justin V D D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
99 COSGROVE Connor R. D D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
100 CHENG Kyle D D D D D V D 1.0 1 -
101 LO Alexander D D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
102 MAKLIN Edward P. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
102 TEVEBAUGH Andrew D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
104 GEORGE Daniel D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
105 LEE Aydan J. D D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
106 COX Luis E. D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
107 MOLINARO Lawrence D D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
108 WALKER Robert Connor D D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Opponent's Difficulty Probability of victory
Very Hard 0% to 20%
Hard 20% to 40%
Roughly even 40% to 60%
Easy 60% to 80%
Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

This visual map of the competition helps to understand:

Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.