Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 2 | WOOD Elden S. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 3 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 3 | ZU Kevin | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 5 | NADILE Henry V. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 6 | BARNETT Adam | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
| 7 | MIKA Casper | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 8 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 9 | SINGER Carson | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 10 | MORREALE John | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 11 | QUAN Nicholas | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 12 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 13 | HAMMER Peter A. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 14 | KIM Avery J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 15 | SHI Andrew | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 16 | LINSKY Matthew | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
| 17 | ZHOU Matthew R. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 18 | LAI Adam J. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 19 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 20 | KIM Minwook | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 21 | ZHOU Kevin | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | LO Joshua H. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 23 | LEE Kyle | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 24 | YAO Jonathan | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 25 | GANTA Vijay | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | CHAN Matthew | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 27 | CHO Brandon | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 28 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% | |
| 29 | LIU kelly | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | |
| 30 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | DODRILL Grant | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 32 | STEINMETZ John | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 33 | JEAN Noe T. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 34 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 35 | LIN William | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | MORRILL Justin | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 37 | CHEN Oscar | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 37 | QIU Le | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 39 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 40 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 41 | RAI Avin | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 42 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 2% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | HUDDY Brandon J. | 4% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | ZHOU Justin | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 45 | MORRILL William | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 46 | CHANG Eliot A. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | HOUTZ Jackson | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 48 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | WOODWARD Dylan P. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 50 | YANG Richard | 8% | 27% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 51 | YEN Preston | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 52 | COLE Alexander | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 53 | GINIS Nathan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 53 | ALTIRS Alexander | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 55 | QIN Alexander | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 57 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 58 | HUANG Tyler T. | 31% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 28% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 60 | NOBLE Colin | 8% | 36% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | LEE Jude H. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | BERMAN Luca | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 63 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | KOGAN Benjamin | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 65 | CHEONG Heonjae | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 66 | WIND Nicky E. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 67 | HUSSAIN Faaris | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 68 | TONG Qilin | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 69 | WILSON Jude | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 70 | KENNEDY Liam A. | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 71 | LEONARD Cole | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 72 | NG Jonathan H. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 73 | REN Richard | 37% | 42% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 74 | FLORES Peter D. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 75 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 76 | RABINKOV Anthony | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 77 | WOODWARD Connor | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 78 | PAN Andrew W. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 79 | GHENEA George Philipe | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 80 | GILES Jeremy M. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 81 | PANDEY Neil | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | LU Timothy | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 83 | GILMORE Thomas W. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 84 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 85 | WUN William | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 86 | JIANG Kevin | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 87 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 88 | DIACOS Jordan | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 89 | ZHOU Miles | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 90 | HARGENRADER Kailen A. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 91 | NIL Michael Y. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 92 | HONG Steven | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 93 | GRASS James D. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 94 | NEVILLE James | 35% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 95 | LEDERER Justin W. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 10% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 96 | KEEFE Duncan | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 98 | LEE Justin | 4% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 99 | COSGROVE Connor R. | 27% | 44% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 100 | CHENG Kyle | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | LO Alexander | 23% | 46% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 102 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 104 | GEORGE Daniel | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 105 | LEE Aydan J. | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 106 | COX Luis E. | 33% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 107 | MOLINARO Lawrence | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 108 | WALKER Robert Connor | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.