USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Junior Women's Foil

Saturday, February 29, 2020 at 1:00 PM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHENG Ivy - - 1% 6% 23% 42% 28%
2 CHUSID Renata M. - - - 1% 7% 36% 56%
3 MAK Tinney - - - 4% 18% 42% 35%
3 LEE Brianna J. - 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
5 CHEN Jia P. - - 2% 11% 31% 40% 17%
6 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. - - 2% 11% 29% 38% 20%
7 HUNT Tarleton Q. - 2% 11% 33% 39% 15%
8 GRIFFIN Emma G. - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
9 LESLIE Ryanne T. - - 1% 6% 22% 41% 30%
10 FREEDMAN Miranda W. - - 1% 5% 23% 44% 27%
11 JING Emily - 1% 7% 25% 42% 25%
12 CASTANEDA Erika L. - - 1% 6% 24% 41% 27%
13 SHEN Sophia H. - 1% 7% 27% 43% 23%
14 CHUSID Mikayla - 2% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4%
15 LEE Allison (Allie) - - 1% 4% 19% 41% 34%
16 HOOSHI Erica S. - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18%
17 MASSICK Laine - - - 4% 21% 44% 31%
18 WANG Ellen - 2% 10% 28% 39% 21%
19 PEVZNER Victoria - - 1% 8% 30% 43% 18%
20 MOLHO Sofia - - 1% 9% 30% 42% 18%
21 JING Alexandra - - - 3% 19% 44% 33%
22 LUNG Katerina - 1% 7% 23% 37% 26% 7%
23 LOW Sharon J. - 2% 13% 32% 36% 15% 2%
24 WEINTRAUB Io H. 1% 9% 26% 34% 22% 7% 1%
25 CHEN Nicole Y. - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 5%
26 SHEN Lydia - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
27 HALL Velma - 1% 5% 20% 36% 29% 8%
28 GOMES Rafaella T. - 1% 6% 22% 36% 28% 7%
29 FERNANDES Thea - 9% 28% 36% 21% 5% -
30 KIM Rachael - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 11%
31 HE Xiangxin - 5% 21% 39% 28% 7%
32 KIM Katherine 1% 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1%
33 KNIGHT Skylar - - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
34 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4%
35 SHI Haoqing - 4% 19% 37% 30% 9% 1%
36 SOOD Ishani S. - 1% 7% 26% 40% 22% 4%
37 HECKMANN Emma - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
38 UPTON Elizabeth 1% 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
39 ATLURI Srija 2% 14% 30% 32% 17% 4% -
40 XUE Alanna - 6% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1%
41 SCHATZ Kristina J. 2% 16% 34% 31% 14% 3% -
42 KOROL Dana 1% 7% 26% 38% 23% 5% -
43 ADAMS KIM Natalie 3% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2%
44 SENIC Adeline 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1%
45 KOENIG Charlotte R. 2% 12% 30% 34% 19% 4%
45 TALWALKAR Apoorva 3% 16% 33% 32% 15% 2%
47 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) - 3% 17% 36% 33% 11%
48 YU Jaime L. 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% -
49 HO Brianna W. - - 1% 8% 28% 43% 20%
50 XU Madison 1% 7% 26% 36% 23% 6% 1%
51 LI Rachel Y. 1% 11% 33% 36% 16% 3% -
52 KOROL Neta 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 5% -
53 DAVIA Daniella V. - - 2% 11% 34% 42% 11%
54 TALAVERA Daena - - 4% 18% 36% 32% 9%
54 COSTELLO Angeline S. - 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
56 LI Meilin 1% 8% 23% 34% 25% 9% 1%
57 WU Renee 3% 16% 33% 32% 15% 2%
58 XU Christine 2% 16% 38% 32% 11% 1%
59 ACHILOVA Feyza 20% 38% 29% 11% 2% -
60 HE Fenghuan 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 9%
61 ZHANG Alina C. 1% 9% 28% 36% 21% 5% 1%
62 CHON Samantha - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
63 THOMAS Aaria S. 8% 35% 37% 16% 3% - -
64 YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) 1% 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
65 CHEN Kelly - 1% 9% 30% 39% 18% 3%
66 RENTON Samantha 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
67 LIN Ashley - 2% 15% 37% 34% 12% 1%
68 CHEN Allison V. - 4% 16% 32% 31% 14% 2%
69 OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. 22% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
70 LEE Bethany W. - 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
71 ZHAO Aileen Y. 3% 16% 34% 31% 14% 3% -
72 SHANG Andrea 1% 8% 26% 36% 22% 6% 1%
73 WU Irene M. 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
74 MCKEE Alexandra K. 2% 31% 43% 20% 4% - -
75 WALKER Mayah J. - 5% 22% 36% 26% 8% 1%
76 DRANOVSKY Dasha 2% 23% 39% 26% 8% 1% -
77 SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. 10% 36% 35% 15% 3% - -
78 DU Hannah 2% 13% 31% 32% 17% 4% -
79 LONG Madeline M. 1% 22% 40% 27% 8% 1% -
80 ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. 8% 35% 37% 16% 3% - -
81 LENZ Zoe N. 46% 40% 12% 2% - - -
82 HUANG NATALIE 2% 14% 35% 34% 13% 2% -
83 CHON Sydney 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2% -
84 SADAN Jordan E. 2% 14% 31% 33% 17% 3%
85 CHEN Jessie S. 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
86 YHIP Mikaela M. 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 5%
87 WU Julianna Y. 23% 45% 25% 6% 1% -
88 WEBB Ella 10% 30% 35% 19% 6% 1% -
89 TAN Clarisse 2% 26% 44% 23% 5% - -
90 OUYANG Bridgette Z. - 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2%
91 PAVE Claire 26% 42% 24% 7% 1% - -
92 FU Qihan 13% 36% 33% 14% 3% - -
93 HOLLE Aviella S. 1% 17% 39% 31% 10% 1% -
94 GU EMILY 12% 40% 35% 12% 2% - -
95 LIN Emma 43% 42% 13% 2% - - -
96 ZULUETA Catherine 49% 39% 11% 1% - - -
97 SU Michelle 19% 38% 30% 11% 2% - -
98 BECCHINA Claire E. 40% 40% 16% 3% - - -
99 SHAW Kayla M. < 1% 4% 16% 32% 32% 15% 2%
100 ZHAO Sophie L. 18% 37% 30% 12% 2% -
101 MAESTRADO Ashley R. 24% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
102 BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. 29% 45% 21% 4% - -
103 HUNT Abigail S. 56% 36% 8% 1% - - -
104 FURST Chloe 61% 32% 6% 1% - - -
105 BHOGAL Sukhneet 83% 16% 1% - - - -
106 SCHATZ Erika J. 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% -
107 KOROTCOVA Anastasia 81% 18% 1% - - - -
108 SHTROM Uma A. 82% 17% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.