USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Junior Women's Foil

Saturday, February 29, 2020 at 1:00 PM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHENG Ivy 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 28%
2 CHUSID Renata M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 56%
3 MAK Tinney 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 35%
3 LEE Brianna J. 100% 100% 94% 75% 41% 10%
5 CHEN Jia P. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 17%
6 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 20%
7 HUNT Tarleton Q. 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 15%
8 GRIFFIN Emma G. 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 35% 8%
9 LESLIE Ryanne T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 30%
10 FREEDMAN Miranda W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 27%
11 JING Emily 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 25%
12 CASTANEDA Erika L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 27%
13 SHEN Sophia H. 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 23%
14 CHUSID Mikayla 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 4%
15 LEE Allison (Allie) 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 34%
16 HOOSHI Erica S. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 18%
17 MASSICK Laine 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 31%
18 WANG Ellen 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 21%
19 PEVZNER Victoria 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 61% 18%
20 MOLHO Sofia 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 18%
21 JING Alexandra 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 33%
22 LUNG Katerina 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 33% 7%
23 LOW Sharon J. 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 18% 2%
24 WEINTRAUB Io H. 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 7% 1%
25 CHEN Nicole Y. 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 30% 5%
26 SHEN Lydia 100% 100% 97% 85% 56% 23% 4%
27 HALL Velma 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 37% 8%
28 GOMES Rafaella T. 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 7%
29 FERNANDES Thea 100% 100% 91% 63% 27% 6% -
30 KIM Rachael 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 11%
31 HE Xiangxin 100% 100% 95% 74% 35% 7%
32 KIM Katherine 100% 99% 94% 73% 38% 11% 1%
33 KNIGHT Skylar 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 24%
34 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4%
35 SHI Haoqing 100% 100% 95% 76% 39% 9% 1%
36 SOOD Ishani S. 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 26% 4%
37 HECKMANN Emma 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 16% 2%
38 UPTON Elizabeth 100% 99% 91% 64% 28% 6% 1%
39 ATLURI Srija 100% 98% 84% 54% 22% 5% -
40 XUE Alanna 100% 100% 94% 69% 30% 6% 1%
41 SCHATZ Kristina J. 100% 98% 82% 48% 17% 3% -
42 KOROL Dana 100% 99% 92% 66% 28% 5% -
43 ADAMS KIM Natalie 100% 97% 80% 45% 13% 2%
44 SENIC Adeline 100% 94% 69% 33% 9% 1%
45 KOENIG Charlotte R. 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4%
45 TALWALKAR Apoorva 100% 97% 81% 49% 17% 2%
47 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) 100% 100% 96% 80% 44% 11%
48 YU Jaime L. 100% 80% 39% 10% 1% -
49 HO Brianna W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 20%
50 XU Madison 100% 99% 92% 66% 30% 7% 1%
51 LI Rachel Y. 100% 99% 88% 55% 19% 3% -
52 KOROL Neta 100% 99% 90% 61% 26% 6% -
53 DAVIA Daniella V. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 53% 11%
54 TALAVERA Daena 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 9%
54 COSTELLO Angeline S. 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1%
56 LI Meilin 100% 99% 91% 68% 34% 10% 1%
57 WU Renee 100% 97% 81% 49% 17% 2%
58 XU Christine 100% 98% 82% 44% 12% 1%
59 ACHILOVA Feyza 100% 80% 42% 13% 2% -
60 HE Fenghuan 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 9%
61 ZHANG Alina C. 100% 99% 90% 62% 27% 6% 1%
62 CHON Samantha 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 17% 2%
63 THOMAS Aaria S. 100% 92% 57% 20% 4% - -
64 YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 9% 1%
65 CHEN Kelly 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 21% 3%
66 RENTON Samantha 100% 98% 84% 53% 21% 4% -
67 LIN Ashley 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 13% 1%
68 CHEN Allison V. 100% 100% 95% 79% 48% 17% 2%
69 OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. 100% 78% 35% 8% 1% - -
70 LEE Bethany W. 100% 100% 96% 76% 40% 11% 1%
71 ZHAO Aileen Y. 100% 97% 82% 48% 17% 3% -
72 SHANG Andrea 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 7% 1%
73 WU Irene M. 100% 99% 89% 60% 25% 6% -
74 MCKEE Alexandra K. 100% 98% 67% 24% 4% - -
75 WALKER Mayah J. 100% 100% 94% 72% 36% 9% 1%
76 DRANOVSKY Dasha 100% 98% 75% 36% 10% 1% -
77 SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. 100% 90% 54% 18% 3% - -
78 DU Hannah 100% 98% 85% 54% 22% 5% -
79 LONG Madeline M. 100% 99% 77% 37% 9% 1% -
80 ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. 100% 92% 56% 20% 4% - -
81 LENZ Zoe N. 100% 54% 14% 2% - - -
82 HUANG NATALIE 100% 98% 85% 50% 15% 2% -
83 CHON Sydney 100% 98% 85% 51% 16% 2% -
84 SADAN Jordan E. 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 3%
85 CHEN Jessie S. 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2%
86 YHIP Mikaela M. 100% 99% 91% 65% 27% 5%
87 WU Julianna Y. 100% 77% 32% 7% 1% -
88 WEBB Ella 100% 90% 60% 26% 6% 1% -
89 TAN Clarisse 100% 98% 72% 29% 5% - -
90 OUYANG Bridgette Z. 100% 100% 97% 80% 45% 14% 2%
91 PAVE Claire 100% 74% 32% 8% 1% - -
92 FU Qihan 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% - -
93 HOLLE Aviella S. 100% 99% 82% 43% 12% 2% -
94 GU EMILY 100% 88% 48% 14% 2% - -
95 LIN Emma 100% 57% 15% 2% - - -
96 ZULUETA Catherine 100% 51% 12% 2% - - -
97 SU Michelle 100% 81% 44% 14% 3% - -
98 BECCHINA Claire E. 100% 60% 20% 4% - - -
99 SHAW Kayla M. 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 17% 2%
100 ZHAO Sophie L. 100% 82% 45% 14% 2% -
101 MAESTRADO Ashley R. 100% 76% 32% 7% 1% - -
102 BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. 100% 71% 26% 5% - -
103 HUNT Abigail S. 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -
104 FURST Chloe 100% 39% 7% 1% - - -
105 BHOGAL Sukhneet 100% 17% 1% - - - -
106 SCHATZ Erika J. 100% 80% 40% 11% 1% -
107 KOROTCOVA Anastasia 100% 19% 1% - - - -
108 SHTROM Uma A. 100% 18% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.