Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
2 | CHUSID Renata M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
3 | MAK Tinney | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
3 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% | |
5 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
6 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
7 | HUNT Tarleton Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
8 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
9 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% |
10 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
11 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
12 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
13 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
14 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
15 | LEE Allison (Allie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
16 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
17 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
18 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% | |
19 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% |
20 | MOLHO Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
21 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 33% |
22 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
23 | LOW Sharon J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
24 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
25 | CHEN Nicole Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 5% |
26 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
27 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
28 | GOMES Rafaella T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
29 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
30 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
31 | HE Xiangxin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
32 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
33 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
34 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
35 | SHI Haoqing | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
36 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
37 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
38 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
39 | ATLURI Srija | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
40 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% |
41 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
42 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
43 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
44 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
45 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
45 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
47 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
48 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
49 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
50 | XU Madison | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
51 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
52 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
53 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 11% |
54 | TALAVERA Daena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
54 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
56 | LI Meilin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
57 | WU Renee | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
58 | XU Christine | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
59 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
60 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | |
61 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
62 | CHON Samantha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
63 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 100% | 92% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
64 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
65 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
66 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
67 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
68 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
69 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
70 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
71 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
72 | SHANG Andrea | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
73 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - |
74 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 98% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
75 | WALKER Mayah J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
76 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 100% | 98% | 75% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
77 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
78 | DU Hannah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
79 | LONG Madeline M. | 100% | 99% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
80 | ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. | 100% | 92% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
81 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
82 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
83 | CHON Sydney | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
84 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
85 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
86 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
87 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 77% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
88 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
89 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 98% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
90 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
91 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
92 | FU Qihan | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
93 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
94 | GU EMILY | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
95 | LIN Emma | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
96 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 51% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
97 | SU Michelle | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
98 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 100% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
99 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
100 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
101 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
102 | BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
103 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
104 | FURST Chloe | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
105 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
106 | SCHATZ Erika J. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
107 | KOROTCOVA Anastasia | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
108 | SHTROM Uma A. | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.