Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 2 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 3 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 3 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
| 5 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 6 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 7 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 24% | 5% |
| 8 | LU Amy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 9 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 10 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% |
| 11 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 12 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 6% |
| 13 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 14 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 24% | 5% |
| 15 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 16 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 20 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 22 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
| 25 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 26 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 28 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 3% |
| 30 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 31 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 34 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 35 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 37 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 39 | JIN Olivia P. | 100% | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 39 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 42 | LIN Selena | 100% | 91% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 47 | BILILIES Sophia | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | BAKER Amelia M. | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 75% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | HUANG Lily | 100% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.