Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HO Brianna W. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 2 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 3 | JING Alexandra | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 47% |
| 3 | CHUSID Mikayla | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 5 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
| 6 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 7 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 8 | HECKMANN Emma | - | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
| 9 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 10 | WANG Ellen | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 11 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 12 | MASSICK Laine | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 13 | LI Meilin | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 15 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 16 | LUNG Katerina | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 17 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 18 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 19 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
| 21 | ZHANG Alina C. | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
| 23 | SHEN Lydia | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 24 | HALL Velma | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 25 | TALAVERA Daena | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 26 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 27 | WU Irene M. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 16% |
| 29 | KOROL Neta | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | CHEN Kelly | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 31 | FU Qihan | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | EYER Hailey M. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 34 | LEE Bethany W. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 35 | UPTON Elizabeth | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 36 | XU Madison | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | SENIC Adeline | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 38 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 39 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 40 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% | |
| 41 | HE Xiangxin | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 42 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 43 | XUE Alanna | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 44 | CHEN Jessie S. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 45 | KIM Katherine | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 47 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | LI Rachel Y. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 49 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 50 | HUANG NATALIE | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 51 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 52 | FERNANDES Thea | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 53 | LEE Lavender | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | XU Christine | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 56 | ATLURI Srija | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 57 | CHO Rebecca H. | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 58 | ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | CHON Sydney | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 60 | WU Julianna Y. | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | CHEN Allison V. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 62 | HUNT Abigail S. | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 63 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 64 | SU Michelle | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | SEO IRENE Y. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 66 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 67 | SCHATZ Erika J. | 1% | 13% | 44% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 68 | GU EMILY | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | LONG Madeline M. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | KOROL Dana | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 72 | DU Hannah | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 73 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 75 | PERLMAN Talia | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 76 | YU Jaime L. | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 77 | LENZ Zoe N. | 9% | 42% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | LIN Ashley | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 79 | ROY Layla | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 80 | LIN Emma | 50% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 81 | PAVE Claire | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | ZULUETA Catherine | 11% | 56% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 83 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 84 | SHTROM Uma A. | 76% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 85 | TAN Clarisse | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 86 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.