Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
| 2 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% |
| 3 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
| 3 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 5 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 6 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
| 7 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
| 8 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
| 9 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 10 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 11 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 12 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 13 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 15 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 17 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 18 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% |
| 19 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 20 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | |
| 21 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 23 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 24 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
| 25 | TALAVERA Daena | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 26 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | |
| 27 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 16% |
| 29 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 31 | FU Qihan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 33 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 34 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 35 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 36 | XU Madison | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 37 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 38 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 39 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 40 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 41 | HE Xiangxin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | |
| 42 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 43 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 44 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% |
| 47 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 49 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 50 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 51 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
| 52 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 53 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 56 | ATLURI Srija | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 57 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 58 | ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | CHON Sydney | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 60 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 62 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 63 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 64 | SU Michelle | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 66 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 67 | SCHATZ Erika J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 68 | GU EMILY | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | LONG Madeline M. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 72 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 73 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 70% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 75 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% | |
| 76 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 77 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 91% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 79 | ROY Layla | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 80 | LIN Emma | 100% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 81 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 89% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 83 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 84 | SHTROM Uma A. | 100% | 24% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 85 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 86 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.