East Point, GA - East Point, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FAYEZ Sherif | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 2 | SHIN Sung (Andy) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
| 3 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
| 3 | ALVIOR Joshua Aethan B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 5 | KIM Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% |
| 6 | TEITENBERG John F. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 7 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 8 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 9 | CAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 10 | CAPELLUA Tommaso | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
| 11 | XU Alex | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 12 | ANDERSON Mathew T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% | |
| 13 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% | |
| 14 | PARK Jong-Eun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 15 | SIVAGAR Leo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | TINSLEY Cole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% | |
| 17 | JAMES Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | KIM Ray | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | MOON Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 20 | DILLE Brice | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | DOELEMAN zeno | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
| 22 | SALISBURY Cary | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | HAN David | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | JUNG Minche | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | LIU Edward | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 27 | JAAFAR Omar | 100% | 97% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SONG Ervin | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 29 | PARNAS Ely | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | LABROZZI Aidan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 30 | LEE Kennith | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 33 | SAYLOR David A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
| 34 | O’DEA Anthony | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 35 | O'CONNOR Riley | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | DILLE Jackson K. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | VAUGHN David | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | SHAH Anuj | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 40 | PAK Matthew | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | YI Daniel | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 43 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 44 | MISKELL William | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | PARNAS Apollo | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | CRANE Matthew T. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | MERMIGKAS John | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | PARAMESH Dhilan R. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 49 | MA Bochen | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% | |
| 50 | WANG Aidan | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | CHOU Ryan | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.