Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ANDREEV Arthur | V V V V D V | V V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
2 | FEINBERG Gabriel M. | V V V D V V | V V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
3 | INSLER Gabriel C. | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
3 | WHELAN Thomas (Tony) | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
5 | JONES Simon A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
6 | MUNLIN Donovan | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
7 | DOLMETSCH Max | D V D D V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
8 | MARKHAM Jimmy | V V D D V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
9 | GIBSON Nowell L. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
10 | JONES Tristan Kai | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
11 | MAISEL Simon F. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
12 | YU Colin | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
13 | LEIGH David A. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
14 | MCDERMOTT Brian | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | INSLER Ethan C. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
16 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
17 | YOSHIDA Stephen R. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
18 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
19 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
20 | MEHALL Michael | D V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
21 | DECKER Tristan H. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
22 | NIXON Christian A. | D D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
23 | MACKIN Samuel | V V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
24 | MORSE Tyler | D V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
25 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | D V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
26 | KRONROD Tal | V D D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
27 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | D V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
28 | THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. | V D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
29 | GARCIA-ROGERS Kyle J. | V D D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
30 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | V D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
31 | WU Joseph | D V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
32 | PRIHODKO Max | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
33 | JIN Alexander | D V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
34 | LANGTON Sawyer | D D V V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
35 | SUMLER Jeffery | D V V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
36 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | V D D V V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
37 | ALFAIATE Lucas | D V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
38 | CARVALHO Daniel S. | V D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
39 | SCOTT George R. | D D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
40 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | D V V D V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
40 | MCDERMOTT James E. | V V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
40 | FOLEY Kevin | V V D D D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
43 | HU Jansen T. | D V V D V D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
44 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | D D V D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
45 | LAI Coby | D V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
46 | SCHACK Samuel D. | V D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
46 | HANRATTY Liam | D D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
48 | SHAH Maximilian A. | V D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
49 | BURKE Cyril | V D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
50 | SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. | V D D D V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
51 | KAIN Brad | D D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
52 | KOLKER Gregory A. | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
53 | ADAMIAN David | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
53 | PAHLAVI Kamran | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
55 | BURNHAM Charlie E. | D D V D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
56 | SKIFFINGTON Sam | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
57 | MATEI Daniel | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
58 | GERSEN Jacob | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
59 | PAPAVASSILIOU Christos | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
59 | HERBERT Harrison | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
61 | HA Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
62 | PAGE Duncan | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
63 | CONNELLY Asa D. | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.