Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MOLHO Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
2 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
3 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
3 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% | |
5 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
6 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% | |
7 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
8 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | |
9 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | |
10 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
11 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
12 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
13 | SHANG Andrea | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
13 | LEVI Lea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
15 | LI Meilin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
16 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
17 | DU Hannah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% | 1% | |
18 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
19 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 94% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | |
20 | CARTER Jane (Jane P (Hall) Carter) P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 26% | |
21 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
22 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
23 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 5% | |
24 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | |
25 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
26 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
27 | SU Michelle | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
28 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
29 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
30 | FU Qihan | 100% | 93% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | |
31 | GU Emily | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
32 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
33 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
34 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
35 | BASSON Bayley D. | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
36 | KERR Margaret E. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% | 2% | |
36 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
38 | SHAW Guinevere L. | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | GARDINER Sophia A. | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
40 | BAO Andria | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
41 | JENKINS Hannah G. | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
42 | OLSEN Jen | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
43 | MAO SHIYI | 100% | 73% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.