Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | GRAHAM Roy J. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 5 | GRIFFITH JACK | V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 6 | KASI Sanjay | V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 7 | PYO Michael M. | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V V D | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 9 | ZHANG Andy W. | V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 10 | SICHITIU Alexander | V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 11 | CHIN Julian S. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | MITCHELL Philip D. | V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 13 | BELLUOMO David C. | V V D V | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 14 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | CHEN Ziyuan | D D V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 16 | ZELJKOVIC Dusan | V V D D D | V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 17 | KNIZHNIK David | V V V V | D | 1.0 | 4 | +3.0 |
| 18 | KWON Ethan | V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 19 | GRANT Lachlan K. | V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 20 | BOBROW Logan | V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | NEWELL Ian A. | D D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 22 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 23 | GISLER Benjamin B. | D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 24 | GATZA Logan | V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 25 | TANG Owen S. | D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | LLIDO Soren | D D V D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 27 | SYLVESTER William Z. | V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | SONG Bryan | D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 29 | BUERGIN Aidan | D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 30 | CANO Diego A. | D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 31 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | LEE Lukas | D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 33 | TIAN Aaron C. | V V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 34 | LEE Jacob | D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 35 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | D D V V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 36 | GAO William | V D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 37 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 38 | KEE Andrew L. | V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 39 | KLYCZEK Andrew | V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 40 | WECHSLER Jacob | D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 41 | ORLOV Dmitriy | D V D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 42 | EMENHEISER Conrad | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 43 | DRESSEL Jet | V V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 44 | PAN Henry | D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 45 | BERNABE Rafael | D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 46 | WANG Winston | D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 47 | ZHENG zhe | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 48 | DE COQUET Maximilian | D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 49 | ZOU Yuming | D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 49 | KUMAMOTO Sota | D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 51 | SONG Austin | D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 52 | TIKHAEV Alexander | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 53 | JOHN AYI Neville Pascal | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 54 | LI Lianhao | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 54 | MILLER Jonathan | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.