Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | V D V V | V V V V V | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 2 | MITCHELL Philip D. | D V V V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 3 | CHEN Ziyuan | V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | KWON Ethan | V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 5 | CHIN Jason Y. | V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 6 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 7 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | D V V V | V V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 8 | PYO Michael M. | V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 9 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | BUERGIN Aidan | V V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 11 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 12 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 13 | CHIN Julian S. | V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 14 | ZHANG Andy W. | D D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 15 | ARIZA Isaac A. | D D V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 16 | GRANT Lachlan K. | V D D D | V V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 17 | GRIFFITH JACK | V V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 18 | BOBROW Logan | V V V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 19 | BERNABE Rafael | D V V V | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 20 | LEE Jacob | V V V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 21 | BELLUOMO David C. | V D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 22 | ROUNTREE Rob | V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 23 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 24 | TIAN Aaron C. | D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 25 | GISLER Benjamin B. | D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 26 | KOBAL Maximilian | V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 27 | NEWELL Ian A. | V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 28 | LEE Lukas | D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 29 | GATZA Logan | D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 30 | WHITEHEAD Amir | V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 31 | CAI Oliver K. | D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 32 | LLIDO Soren | D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | YU Jonathan J. | D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | KEE Andrew L. | D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 35 | SICHITIU Alexander | V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 36 | WERWA Griffith | D V D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 37 | CANO Diego A. | D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 38 | EMENHEISER Conrad | D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 39 | DABNEY Justin | D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 40 | PAULSON Connor M. | D D V D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 41 | ZHENG zhe | D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 42 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 43 | WALTER Evran M. | V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 44 | WECHSLER Jacob | D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 45 | SYLVESTER William Z. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 46 | JOHN AYI Neville Pascal | D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.