Fairfield, CT - Fairfield, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 2 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 3 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | BING Charles | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 5 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 5 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 7 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% |
| 8 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 9 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 10 | GUO Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 11 | CATINO Brennen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 12 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
| 13 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 14 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 15 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 18 | ZHOU Andrew C. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 20 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 20 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | NICOLL William | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | LORANGER Peter | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 26 | CHAN Justin D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | BENATER Adam | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 31 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 32 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | NICOLL James | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 35 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 36 | UHRMACHER Idris | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | HU Jason | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | PLASTARAS Trey | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 91% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.