Magic City SYC/RCC

Youth 12 Men’s Saber (Y12MS)

Friday, December 2, 2022 at 3:00 PM

Register

Birmingham Jefferson Convention Complex - Birmingham, AL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2500 2661 - 2430
5 - 8 2356 2452 - 2289
9 - 16 2022 2196 - 1872
17 - 28 1526 1905 - 998

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Chambers, Miles Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 2661 2396.68
2 Liu, Victor Sigma Fencing Academy U 2471 2194.21
3 Pinto, Marcus Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 2430 2177.08
4 Srivats, Vedh Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 2437 2174.62
5 Ye, Ivan Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 2452 2103.58
6 li, linze LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 2346 2085.03
7 LI, AYDEN Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 2289 2035.06
8 Hu, Harry Nellya Fencers U 2336 2028.98
9 Yuen, Caleb LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 2189 1929.81
10 Anand, Rishab Nellya Fencers U 2196 1919.39
11 Yang, Justin Elite Fencing Academy (GA) U 2021 1694.38
12 Burgess, Beckham Athens Fencing Club U 2092 1690.81
13 Wang, Alex Globus Fencing Academy U 1983 1662.53
14 Kumar, Avinash Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1872 1570.37
15 Liu, Aaron Nellya Fencers U 1873 1559.42
16 Moeller, Felix Sigma Fencing Academy U 1948 1504.49
17 Crooks, Andrew Integrity Fencing Studio U 1905 1497.78
18 Nambiar, Navin Frisco Fencing Academy U 1740 1440.36
19 Luo, Leonard Nellya Fencers U 1903 1355.25
20 Barry, Dave Sigma Fencing Academy U 1736 1254.98
21 Zhang, Aiden Sigma Fencing Academy U 1694 1234.71
22 Liu, Ethan Nellya Fencers U 1617 1136.35
23 Kohler, Vaughn Nellya Fencers U 1478 944.34
24 Mannino, Miller Sigma Fencing Academy U 1624 884.99
25 Tunik, Joshuah Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1207 755.40
26 Yao, Zachary Sigma Fencing Academy U 1277 689.40
27 Gordon, Ezekiel Nellya Fencers U 998 339.12
28 Mahapatra, Siddhant Sigma Fencing Academy U 1132 91.62

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!