The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | FUKUDA Diego | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
3 | LO Preston | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
3 | NGUYEN martin | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
5 | MORROW Brenden | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
6 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
7 | NICOLETTI Luca | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
8 | TSAY Jordan R. | V V V D D | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
9 | MAO Lucas | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
10 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
11 | RASMUSSEN Sage | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
12 | KIAYIAS Aris | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
13 | LING Eddie | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
14 | KIM Daniel Y. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
15 | WONG Jacob W. | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
16 | DERRICK Blake | V V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
17 | SENIC Lucas | V V V V V V | V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
18 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | V V D V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
19 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | V V V V D V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
20 | WU Alber Y. | V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
21 | BORG Matthew | V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
22 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | V V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
23 | UHLIG Cole | D V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
24 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | D V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
25 | YI William | D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
26 | LEE Christopher T. | D D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
27 | NGAI Julian | D D D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
28 | DANIEL Nikith | V V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
29 | SHEN Oliver | D V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
30 | PARK Rion | D V D V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
31 | LU Kevin | D V D D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
32 | YANG Charles | V V D D D V | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
33 | CHANG Jeremy | V V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
34 | BIELER Mason | V D V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
35 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | V D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
36 | DULAI Angad | V V V V D D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
37 | LI Richard | V D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
38 | HE Ian | V V D V V D | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
39 | KAWADA Sebastien | D V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
40 | MORROW Sean | V D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
41 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
42 | ZHANG Graham | V D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
43 | CHUN Dashel | V D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
44 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | D V D D V V | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
45 | WONG Evan | V D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
46 | PARK William | V D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
47 | FUKUDA Brando | D D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
48 | ZHOU Ryan | D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
49 | LEHTINEN Axel | V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
50 | GORDON William L. | V V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
51 | CHOI Ethan | D D V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
52 | CHEN Matthew | D D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
53 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | V D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
54 | JEONG Taewoo | D V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
55 | DULAI Agam | V D V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
56 | CHEN David | D V D D D | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
57 | MANIKTALA Suvir | V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
58 | HE Bourne | D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
59 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | D D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
60 | LE Jacob | V D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
61 | FU Bryan | D D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
62 | TULYAG Azim | V D D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
63 | ZHANG Max | D D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
64 | YUE Jackson | D D D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
65 | UPENDER West | D D D V V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
66 | SISINNI Leonardo | D V D V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
67 | CHAN Joseph | D V D V D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
68 | PARK Roy | D V D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
69 | WANG rainier | V D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
70 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
71 | CHANG Jonathan | D V D D D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
72 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | D D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
73 | ANDRADE Cedric | D V D V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
74 | HOM Logan | D D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
75 | CHEN Andrew | D D V V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
76 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
77 | SONG Matthew | D D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
78 | WANDJI NANA Noah | D D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
79 | WU Thomas | D D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
80 | BANUELOS Dario | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
81 | LIM Zachary | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
82 | ZHONG Maxwell | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
83 | DENG David | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
84 | KIM Andrew | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
85 | LIANG Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
85 | ONG Nicholas | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
87 | YAN Rian | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
87 | FOY Grant | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.