Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
2 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
3 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
3 | LOISEAU Oscar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
5 | NAKAS Levent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
6 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
7 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
8 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
9 | FENG shang | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
10 | LAM Alan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% | |
11 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
12 | X Benjamin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
13 | HUANG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
14 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
15 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
16 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
17 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
18 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 9% |
19 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% | |
20 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% | |
21 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
22 | DEGRUCCIO Johnny | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
23 | SHCHUR Grayson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 26% | 5% |
24 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
25 | GONZALEZ Aaron M | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% | |
26 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 2% | |
27 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
28 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
29 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
30 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - | |
31 | RATMANSKY Alexander | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
32 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
33 | DURKIN Hudson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
34 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
35 | AHN EZRA | 100% | 89% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | PARK Aiden | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
37 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
38 | KIM Tae | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
39 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
40 | NOVOJILOV Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
41 | WUNDER Eli | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
42 | CANN Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
43 | CZEPLA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
44 | AYOTTE James | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
45 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
46 | LIU Adam | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
47 | KENDLER Micah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 4% |
48 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
49 | YIN Justin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
50 | MUKHERJEE Advik | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | - | |
51 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
52 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
53 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - | |
54 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
55 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
56 | KIM Julian | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
57 | CHOW Jovan | 100% | 79% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
58 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
59 | KIM Henry | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
60 | OZBAY Alp | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
61 | DONE Kevin | 100% | 95% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
62 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - | |
63 | ADAMES Alberto | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
64 | COSME, JR David | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.