New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
2 | SEMEL Liana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
3 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
3 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
5 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
6 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
7 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
8 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
9 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
10 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
11 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
12 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
13 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
14 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
15 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
16 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
17 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
18 | FU Qihan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
19 | SU Michelle | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
20 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
21 | HSIEH Rebecca | 100% | 87% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
22 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
23 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
24 | MI Aileen | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
25 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
26 | MI Anning | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
27 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% |
28 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
29 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 98% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | GU Emily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
31 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
32 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
33 | SEO Irene Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
34 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
35 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
36 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 99% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
37 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 73% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
38 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
39 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 84% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
40 | ROHRING Anna | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | ZHENG Ying | 100% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
42 | WININGER-SIEVE Taylor | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.