New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 25% |
| 2 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 3 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 48% |
| 3 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 5 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% |
| 6 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 7 | WANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
| 8 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 10 | JAUME Andrei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 11 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 12 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 13 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 14 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 6% |
| 15 | CHREKY Jacob D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 42% | 6% |
| 16 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 11% |
| 17 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
| 18 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 19 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% | 29% | 4% |
| 20 | MILLER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 21 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
| 22 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | MCCAULEY Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 25 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 26 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 27 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 28 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 30 | HONG Issac | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 31 | GLEBA Nico | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% |
| 34 | MOO Gareth G. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | BROWN Alexander R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 36 | BAO Chris W. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 37 | BALESTRACCI Chris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% |
| 38 | HOLTZ Donovan K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 20% |
| 39 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 41 | BENTLEY Nick | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 44 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 45 | JOHNSON Cooper A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% |
| 46 | AMRANI David | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 47 | VALENTON Timothy | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 48 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 50 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 51 | LI Ayren | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 52 | NIECHWADOWICZ Michael | 100% | 75% | 23% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | WU Michael | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 54 | GARDOS Noah | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | MORGESON Colin | 100% | 88% | 45% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 58 | MAGALONG William | 100% | 65% | 18% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | XU Ethan | 100% | 92% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 60 | TSIMMERMAN Michael | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 61 | POPE Alexander | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 62 | WU Benjamin | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 63 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 64 | DEVAUX Ryan T. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | HAYLON Caleb | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 65 | WERTZ Erik | 100% | 93% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.