Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | |
2 | JOYCE Michaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
3 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
3 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% | |
5 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
6 | CEBULA Anne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
7 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
8 | YAMANAKA Mina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 8% |
9 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
10 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
11 | KETKAR Ketki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
12 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
13 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
14 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
15 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
16 | ROSS Naomi O. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
17 | WANG Karen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 7% |
18 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
19 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
20 | LIN Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
21 | GANDHI Sedna S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
22 | GARINA Ania (Ganusia) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
23 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
24 | WANG Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 3% | |
25 | GRADY Miriam A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
26 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | |
27 | TOBY Natalia R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
28 | KHROL Jaclyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 8% |
29 | MANGANO Ariana J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
30 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
31 | HENRY Asha S. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
32 | LEE Michelle J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
33 | PATURU Meghana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
34 | NI Emma | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
35 | CHAN Cheri K. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
36 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
37 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
38 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
39 | LEE Sumin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
40 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
40 | MESCHIA Maggie | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | < 1% | - | - |
42 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
43 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
44 | MCLANE Lauren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
45 | ANGEN Katie R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
46 | CONSTANTINO Lola | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
47 | DANIEL Chloe L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
48 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
48 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
50 | ISERT Sarah | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
51 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
52 | WATRALL Christina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
53 | MAO Amy | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
54 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
55 | BATES Cassandra L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 13% |
55 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
57 | CHU Audrey | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
58 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
59 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | TONCHEVA Victoria M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
61 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% | |
62 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
63 | YEU Irene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
64 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | - | |
65 | STEWART Tatijana I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 11% |
66 | VERMEULE Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
67 | WANG Nora | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
68 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% | 1% |
69 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
70 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 3% | |
71 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
72 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
73 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
74 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
75 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
76 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
77 | MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - | |
78 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
78 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
80 | CHOI Eunice | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
81 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
82 | GABERKORN Nadia | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
83 | COBERT Helen G. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | - | |
84 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
85 | RATZLAFF Jocelyn T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
86 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
87 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
88 | DONDISCH Sophia | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
89 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
90 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
91 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
91 | MARTUS Cosima O. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
93 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
94 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
95 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
96 | BOYS Nishta B. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
96 | FELAND Alexandra | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
98 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
98 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
100 | LEANG Andrea K. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
101 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | |
102 | BOK Michelle | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
103 | JAMES Josephine | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
104 | MILLER Veronica | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
105 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
106 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
107 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
108 | MYLER AnneMarie | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
109 | RUEDA Rylie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 4% |
110 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
111 | LURYE Sarah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
112 | HEDVAT Alexis S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
113 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
114 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
115 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
116 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
117 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
118 | AHUJA Arianna | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
119 | KIM Erika S. | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
120 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | - |
121 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
122 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
123 | LONG Cindy | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
124 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
125 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.