Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 2 | THOMPSON Kamali A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | |
| 3 | LINDER Kara E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 3 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% | |
| 5 | THEODORE Maria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 6 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
| 7 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
| 8 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 13% |
| 9 | JENKINS Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
| 10 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
| 11 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 12 | CHAN Casey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% | |
| 13 | YUN Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 14 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 10% |
| 16 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 17 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 18 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 21 | HARRILL Gillian N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
| 22 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 24 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 25 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 26 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | ADYNSKI Gillian I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 28 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 30 | WITEK Sophie B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 31 | BROWN Emma | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 34 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% |
| 35 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 36 | PARKER Abigale B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 37 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 38 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 39 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 5% |
| 39 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 42 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 43 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 44 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% | 5% |
| 45 | CHANG Josephine S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 46 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 47 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 48 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 6% | |
| 49 | LIU Rachel | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 50 | WHANG Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 51 | XI Shining | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 52 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 53 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 54 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 55 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 56 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 57 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | KER Grace | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 59 | HONE Katarina G. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 60 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 61 | KOVACS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 62 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 63 | LEVITIS Danielle | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 65 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 66 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 67 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 68 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 69 | YUN Maya | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 70 | YAP Madeline | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 71 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 72 | GORMLEY Arwen E. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 73 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 74 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 75 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 76 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 77 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 78 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 79 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 80 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 81 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 76% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 83 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 83 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 85 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 86 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 87 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 89 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | LU Amy | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 92 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 93 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 94 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 95 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
| 96 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 97 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 98 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 99 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 100 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 101 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 102 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 103 | VALADEZ Emily T. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 104 | SATHE Mehek S. | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 105 | KONG Carys H. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 106 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 107 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 108 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 109 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 109 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 111 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 112 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 113 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 114 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 114 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.