Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
2 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
3 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
3 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 17% |
5 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
6 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
7 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
8 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | |
9 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
10 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
11 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
12 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% | |
13 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 11% | |
14 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% | |
15 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 48% | |
16 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
17 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
18 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 4% |
19 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 12% |
20 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
21 | LEE Rachel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
22 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
23 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | |
24 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
25 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 37% |
26 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
27 | FENG ge | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | - |
28 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
29 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
30 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | - |
31 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
32 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 5% | - |
33 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
34 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
34 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 27% | |
36 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
37 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% |
38 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
38 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
40 | CHI Chelsea | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
41 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 6% |
42 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
43 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
44 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
44 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 4% | - |
46 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
47 | MIN MAGNOLIA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
48 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
49 | YAN Grace | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 4% | - | |
50 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
51 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
52 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
53 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
54 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
55 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
56 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
57 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
58 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
59 | YOU Emily | 100% | 96% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | |
60 | SUN Renee R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
61 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
62 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 86% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
62 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 32% | 4% |
64 | BROWN Hannah | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
65 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
66 | BURCHETT Victoria | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
66 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
68 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
69 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
70 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
71 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
72 | PATIL Amulya | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | |
73 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
73 | SONG Angela | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | |
75 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
76 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 5% |
77 | LEE Claire | 100% | 92% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
78 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
79 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
80 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
81 | NEMETH Katherine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
82 | NEELAM Neha | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
83 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
84 | KORKIN Alice | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
85 | HAYNES Antonia | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
86 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
87 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 3% | - | |
88 | POPOVICI Alina B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
89 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
90 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 96% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
91 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
92 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
93 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
94 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
94 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
96 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 72% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
97 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
98 | HSU Adele Y. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
99 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
100 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
101 | MISHIMA Audrey | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
101 | MEYER Rachel | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
103 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
104 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
105 | PERVEZ Zaynab | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
106 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
107 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
108 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
109 | SHEN Yongen | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
109 | XU Katelyn | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
111 | MACEY Hadley | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
112 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
113 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
114 | GUAN Isabella | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
115 | POON Desiree | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
116 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
117 | BENZAN India | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 3% | - | |
118 | DONGES Anna | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
119 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
119 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
121 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
122 | NIX Reagan | 100% | 80% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
123 | DONDISCH Andrea | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
124 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
124 | MEYER Rebecca | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
126 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 85% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
126 | MIHILL Margaret | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.