The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

National Championships, Junior Olympic Championships & July NAC

Y-12 Men's Saber

Friday, July 9, 2021 at 1:00 PM

Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 HOLZ Daniel V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.2 6 +0.8
2 GONZALEZ Emilio A. V D V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 5 -0.7
3 HUANG Alex F. V V D V V V V V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
3 SU Landon V V D V V D V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
5 YANG Dylan V V V V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
6 ANDRES Michael V V V V V V V V V D 5.1 6 +0.9
7 SUGIURA Samuel D V V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
8 ANTHONY Devyn V. V D D V V V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
9 IDRISSI Idris V V D V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
10 JOO Jeein V V D V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
11 GERSTMANN Max T. V D V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
12 KUSHKOV Daniel V V V V D D V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
13 YAN William D D V V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
14 MEHAN Nicholas V V V D V D V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
15 ZHAO Lucas V D D V D V V V V D 4.4 3 -1.4
16 PATEL Rayn D V D D D V V V D 3.5 1 -2.5
17 KALPATHY Rohit V V V V V V V D 3.7 6 +2.3
18 SHANKWILER Christopher V V V V V V V D 3.5 6 +2.5
19 RAMANAN Jaisimh V V V V V V D 2.8 5 +2.2
20 TANG Shu Hon V V V V D V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
21 CARRINGTON IV William T. V V D V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
22 KANG Evan V V V D V V V D 2.3 5 +2.7
23 GUREVICH Benjamin V D V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
24 BERA Enzo V D D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
25 CHOW William T. D V V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
26 ANAND Rohan D V V D V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
27 SHIPITSIN Alexander V V V D D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
28 GUAN Dennis V V V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
29 HRISTOV Kris D D D V V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
30 KOVALEV Daniil N. V D D V V D V V D 4.4 3 -1.4
31 WONG Caleb W. V V D D D D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
32 BONETTI Brayden D D V V D D V V D 4.4 2 -2.4
33 YERRAMILLI Tejas V V V V V V D 1.8 6 +4.2
34 EYBELMAN Ariel V V V V V V D 3.3 6 +2.7
35 PRIMUS Nazir V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
36 KWALWASSER Eric D V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
37 PI Alexander V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
38 LI Yiwei V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
39 NORTON Benjamin D V V V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
40 KERCHER Alexander V D V V V D D 4.2 4 -0.2
41 SAGE Sebastian V V V V D D D 4.3 4 -0.3
42 SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. V D V D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
43 SO Preston D V D V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
44 URSU Marcel T. D V D V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
45 HUNG Samuel D V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
45 OH Aster D V V V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
47 VAID Luke V D V V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
48 TUNG Ryan D V V V D V V D 1.6 4 +2.4
49 GONG Jerry V V D D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
50 LIU Vince D D V V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
51 CRAIG Andrew D V V D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
52 HOLZ Lucas D D V D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
53 GUFFEY Christopher D V V D D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
54 CHANG Leo V D D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
55 KUMAR Arjun D V D V V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
56 JORGESON Charlie D D V D V V D 2.0 2 -
57 JAIN Samyak V V D D D D V D 2.0 2 -
58 BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. D D D V V D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
59 NARDINI Nathanael P. D D V V D D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
60 SHINCHUK Daniel V D V D D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
61 WITCZAK Mateus V D D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
62 ERMAKOV Semeon D V D D V D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
63 KIETLINSKI Samuel D D V D D V V D 3.7 2 -1.7
64 LIU Kevin V V D D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
65 ANAND Rishab V V V D V D D 2.8 4 +1.2
66 MISHRA Aadi V D D V V D 1.3 3 +1.7
67 HO Nathaniel D V V D V D D 2.1 3 +0.9
68 MEDVINSKY Daniel V V V D D D D 4.5 3 -1.5
69 NGUYEN Anthony D D V V V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
70 RAMANAN Govind D V D V V D D 1.9 3 +1.1
70 RAMTEKKAR Soham V V D D V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
72 LIN Philip T. V D V D V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
73 WANG Zhuoyi D V V D V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
74 TIAGI George V V V D D D D 1.7 3 +1.3
75 PRIEUR Christian F. V D D V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
76 FANG Eason V V D D D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
77 LIU Victor D D V V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
78 KIM Ethan D D D V D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
79 KIM Samuel D D D V D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
80 HALL Noah V D D D V D D 2.7 2 -0.7
81 KOGAN Yelisey L. D V V D D D D 3.6 2 -1.6
82 GONG Gavin V D V D D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
83 LEE Matthew D V D D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
84 YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) V D D D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
84 SANGSTER Arden D V D V D D D 0.9 2 +1.1
86 CAO Oliver D D V D V D D 2.3 2 -0.3
87 MENDOZA Diwa D D V V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
88 HO Anson D D D D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
89 RAJMOHAN Arya D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
90 YANG Phillip D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
91 CLARK Aram V D D D D 4.0 1 -3.0
92 ALAVE Kyle V D D D D D 2.9 1 -1.9
93 GAY Jono D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
94 TSAO Oliver D V D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
94 LIU Ryan D D D D D V 2.0 1 -1.0
94 WANG Justin D V D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
97 HAPP Braeden D D V D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
98 DOMINIQUE Remson D D D D D V 2.8 1 -1.8
98 CHUNG Connor D D V D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
100 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary D D D D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
101 MCDONALD Finn V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
102 BRIMMER Trey D D D V D D 1.0 1 -
103 WANG Max D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
103 SARWAHI Viraat D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
105 VILEMAITIS Tadas D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
105 DEELY Hartigan D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
107 VENKATRAMAN Sudhir D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
108 SAMMI Mukul D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
109 BREUER Daniel D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
110 LOU Kaden D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.