Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLZ Daniel | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 2 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 3 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 50% |
| 3 | SU Landon | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 5 | YANG Dylan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
| 6 | ANDRES Michael | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 7 | SUGIURA Samuel | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 8 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 19% |
| 9 | IDRISSI Idris | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 10 | JOO Jeein | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 11 | GERSTMANN Max T. | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 13 | YAN William | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 14 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 15 | ZHAO Lucas | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 16 | PATEL Rayn | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 17 | KALPATHY Rohit | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 18 | SHANKWILER Christopher | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 20 | TANG Shu Hon | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 22 | KANG Evan | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | BERA Enzo | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
| 25 | CHOW William T. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 26 | ANAND Rohan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 27 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 28 | GUAN Dennis | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | |
| 29 | HRISTOV Kris | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 30 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 31 | WONG Caleb W. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | BONETTI Brayden | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
| 33 | YERRAMILLI Tejas | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | < 1% |
| 34 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 1% | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | PRIMUS Nazir | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 36 | KWALWASSER Eric | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 37 | PI Alexander | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 38 | LI Yiwei | - | - | 5% | 21% | 41% | 30% | 3% |
| 39 | NORTON Benjamin | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 40 | KERCHER Alexander | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 33% | 9% |
| 41 | SAGE Sebastian | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% |
| 42 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | SO Preston | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 44 | URSU Marcel T. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% |
| 45 | HUNG Samuel | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | OH Aster | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | VAID Luke | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 48 | TUNG Ryan | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | GONG Jerry | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 50 | LIU Vince | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 51 | CRAIG Andrew | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 52 | HOLZ Lucas | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 53 | GUFFEY Christopher | 5% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | CHANG Leo | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 55 | KUMAR Arjun | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 56 | JORGESON Charlie | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 57 | JAIN Samyak | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 59 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 60 | SHINCHUK Daniel | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 61 | WITCZAK Mateus | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 62 | ERMAKOV Semeon | - | 2% | 10% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 7% |
| 63 | KIETLINSKI Samuel | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 64 | LIU Kevin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 65 | ANAND Rishab | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 66 | MISHRA Aadi | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | HO Nathaniel | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 68 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 69 | NGUYEN Anthony | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 70 | RAMANAN Govind | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 70 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 72 | LIN Philip T. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 73 | WANG Zhuoyi | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 74 | TIAGI George | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 9% | 27% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 76 | FANG Eason | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 77 | LIU Victor | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 78 | KIM Ethan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 79 | KIM Samuel | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 80 | HALL Noah | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 81 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 82 | GONG Gavin | 32% | 40% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | LEE Matthew | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 84 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | SANGSTER Arden | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | CAO Oliver | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 87 | MENDOZA Diwa | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 88 | HO Anson | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 89 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 90 | YANG Phillip | 28% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 91 | CLARK Aram | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% | |
| 92 | ALAVE Kyle | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 93 | GAY Jono | 7% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 94 | TSAO Oliver | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 94 | LIU Ryan | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 94 | WANG Justin | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 97 | HAPP Braeden | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 98 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 1% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 98 | CHUNG Connor | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 100 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 101 | MCDONALD Finn | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 102 | BRIMMER Trey | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | WANG Max | 9% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 103 | SARWAHI Viraat | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 105 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 105 | DEELY Hartigan | 16% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 107 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 108 | SAMMI Mukul | 19% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 109 | BREUER Daniel | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 110 | LOU Kaden | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.