Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Michael | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 2 | ORLOV Dmitriy | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% | |
| 3 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
| 3 | LI Matthew | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 55% | 22% |
| 5 | ROSE Ben | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 6 | TANG Owen S. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 7 | SONG Austin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 47% | 13% |
| 8 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | YAO Bradley | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 10 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | - | - | 5% | 37% | 58% |
| 11 | WANG Winston | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 11% |
| 12 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 48% | 38% |
| 13 | MOE Annan | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | MAO Lucas | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 15 | MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 49% | 35% |
| 16 | SHENG Dalton | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
| 17 | TANG Albert | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 12% | |
| 18 | QIAN Jason H. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 19 | PAN Henry | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | QUINTERO Julian | 4% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | GUTH Joseph | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | HUTH Trevor | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
| 23 | VADEN Oliver | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 20% | 2% |
| 24 | TANG August L. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 25 | KOE Beckett | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | DHOKTE Neev | - | 6% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 27 | PARRISH Evan | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | ZOU Yuming | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | LI Lianhan | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | TANG Alexander L. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 31 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 32 | LUAN Tian | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 33 | MARISI Gabriel | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 34 | WANG Brayden | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | JIANG Bowang | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 36 | HUANG Eythan | - | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
| 37 | SEMP Iain | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ZHANG Alex | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 39 | RILEY Colin T. | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | ZHAO Adam | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 41 | SUAREZ Adrian | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | LU Nathan | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | - | - |
| 43 | SINGU Dhruva | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | YU William | 16% | 56% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | PAN Edwin | 2% | 19% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 46 | KIM Chaevin | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | DEMIR Omer | 12% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | CAO Vincent | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | HE Kyle | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | BOWLES K | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | LEE Ethan | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | MACKAY Ian | 67% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | SHAW Spencer | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | ZAIDI Adil | 2% | 49% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.