Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
| 2 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | |
| 3 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 3 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 22% |
| 5 | ROSE Ben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% |
| 6 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
| 7 | SONG Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 13% |
| 8 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 20% | |
| 10 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 58% |
| 11 | WANG Winston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 11% |
| 12 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% |
| 13 | MOE Annan | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 7% | - |
| 15 | MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 35% |
| 16 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 3% |
| 17 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 12% | |
| 18 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 19 | PAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 13% | 1% |
| 20 | QUINTERO Julian | 100% | 96% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | HUTH Trevor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% |
| 23 | VADEN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% | 2% |
| 24 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 25 | KOE Beckett | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | DHOKTE Neev | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 21% | 3% | |
| 27 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | ZOU Yuming | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 29 | LI Lianhan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 32 | LUAN Tian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 33 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 34 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | JIANG Bowang | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 8% | |
| 37 | SEMP Iain | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ZHANG Alex | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 39 | RILEY Colin T. | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 41 | SUAREZ Adrian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | LU Nathan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | - | - |
| 43 | SINGU Dhruva | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | YU William | 100% | 84% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | PAN Edwin | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | KIM Chaevin | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 47 | DEMIR Omer | 100% | 88% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | CAO Vincent | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | HE Kyle | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | BOWLES K | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | LEE Ethan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | MACKAY Ian | 100% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | ZAIDI Adil | 100% | 98% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.