Kenosha, WI - Kenosha, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | TALAVERA Daena | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 2 | HALL Velma | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
| 3 | MASSICK Laine | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% |
| 3 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 36% | 6% |
| 5 | DEBACK Greta I. | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 43% | 9% |
| 6 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 7 | SOOD Ishani S. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
| 8 | FERNANDES Thea | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
| 9 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
| 10 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 11 | SENIC Adeline | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 13% | |
| 12 | WILSON Anna S. | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 13 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 5% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 3% | |
| 14 | WEBB Ella | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | LEE Fiona E. | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 3% | 24% | 50% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 17 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 30% | 50% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 18 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | |
| 19 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 20 | BAWA Sahana | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 21 | YANG Lingting | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | |
| 22 | MCNALLY Teagan | 39% | 47% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.