Kenosha, WI - Kenosha, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | TALAVERA Daena | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
| 2 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
| 3 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 3 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | 6% |
| 5 | DEBACK Greta I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | 9% |
| 6 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 7 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
| 8 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 94% | 63% | 22% | 3% | |
| 9 | NEWHARD Zelia K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
| 10 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 11 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | |
| 12 | WILSON Anna S. | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 13 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 3% | |
| 14 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 15 | LEE Fiona E. | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 17 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 100% | 70% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 18 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
| 19 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 20 | BAWA Sahana | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 21 | YANG Lingting | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | MCNALLY Teagan | 100% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.