Birmingham, AL - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | - | 4% | 38% | 57% | |
| 2 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | - | - | - | 5% | 95% |
| 3 | GRIFFITH JACK | - | - | 2% | 17% | 49% | 32% | |
| 3 | LIMA Kevin M. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 39% | |
| 5 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 50% | 33% | |
| 6 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 38% | |
| 7 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 24% | - |
| 8 | GISLER Benjamin B. | - | 16% | 47% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 9 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | - | 7% | 30% | 43% | 19% | - |
| 10 | LEE Jacob | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 11 | GATZA Logan | - | 3% | 23% | 57% | 16% | 1% | |
| 12 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | - | - | 1% | 14% | 58% | 27% | |
| 13 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 1% | 19% | 43% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 14 | YIM Alex | 1% | 19% | 43% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 15 | BERNABE Rafael | 10% | 42% | 40% | 8% | - | - | |
| 16 | LEE Lukas | 12% | 44% | 38% | 7% | - | - | |
| 17 | ROSS III Paul D. | 3% | 51% | 38% | 8% | - | - | |
| 18 | KIM Chaemin | 2% | 20% | 45% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 19 | JITTAN daniel | - | 5% | 31% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
| 20 | HEARN Christen J. | 2% | 27% | 44% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | LEE EUNJAE | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 22 | WANG Brayden | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | LEE EUNSOO | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
| 24 | ZOU Yuming | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 25 | STOTT James | 6% | 33% | 45% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.