Garfield, NJ - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 42% |
| 2 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 3 | GETS Matthew D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 9% | |
| 3 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 5 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 6 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 7 | MORREALE John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 14% | |
| 8 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 7% | - |
| 9 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | |
| 10 | DEGEORGES Cole C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
| 11 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 9% | |
| 12 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 49% | |
| 14 | JACOBSON Matthew A. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 16 | BULL Anderson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% | |
| 18 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 27% | 3% | |
| 19 | HAST Kern R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 6% | |
| 20 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 24% | |
| 22 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 23 | RAUSCHER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 4% | |
| 24 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 92% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | GREENE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
| 26 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 27 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | CHEN Evan P. | 100% | 90% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | BUCCINO George | 100% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 9% | - | |
| 31 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 14% | |
| 32 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | CADAMBI Roshan | 100% | 81% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | LEDERER Justin W. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | DA GRACA Aidan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 36 | GILPIN Samuel | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | EAVES Jude | 100% | 83% | 30% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 79% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 40 | MIRDALA Drew | 100% | 71% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 41 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 100% | 90% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 100% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 43 | WRUBEL Natan G. | 100% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | KEOGH Jonathan | 100% | 77% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.