Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 56% | |
2 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% | |
3 | WU Julianna Y. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% |
3 | LI Rachel Y. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 50% | |
5 | WU Irene M. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
6 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% |
7 | XUE Alanna L. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 30% | |
8 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | - | 3% | 19% | 47% | 32% | |
9 | SHENG Chuxi | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
10 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 42% | 10% | |
11 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
12 | DU Hannah | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
13 | ZHENG Julie | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% | |
14 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 3% | |
15 | XIANG Emma | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 32% | 4% | |
16 | YU Lauren C. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
17 | WANG Jasmine | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
18 | WANG Ashley | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 2% | |
19 | HSIEH Rebecca | 3% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 4% | - | |
20 | HOU Wendong | 9% | 37% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | |
21 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 45% | 14% | |
22 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
23 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
24 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 7% | 31% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - | |
25 | LUH Mia P. | 6% | 38% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
26 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 9% | 33% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
27 | FU Qihan | - | 1% | 15% | 45% | 33% | 5% | |
28 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 1% | 18% | 50% | 26% | 4% | - | |
29 | CHEN Jasmine | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - | |
30 | HATZOGLU Isabella | 18% | 54% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
31 | MEYER Claudia | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
31 | MUSTO Isabella | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | |
33 | LEE Kaitlyn | 23% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
34 | SCARLETT Skye | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
35 | MENON Rhea | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
36 | HSIEH Sabrina | 60% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
37 | TANG Sophia | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
38 | LIN Victoria T. | 2% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | PAULUS Isabella | 20% | 45% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
40 | MENDEZ Jalena | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
41 | LENZ Zoe N. | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
42 | BIENSTOCK Alexis | 3% | 34% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | |
43 | CHEN Miley | 70% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.