Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% | |
2 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | |
3 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 15% |
3 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | |
5 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
6 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% |
7 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 30% | |
8 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | |
9 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
10 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 10% | |
11 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% |
12 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
13 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 11% | |
14 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | 3% | |
15 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 4% | |
16 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
17 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
18 | WANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 2% | |
19 | HSIEH Rebecca | 100% | 97% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | |
20 | HOU Wendong | 100% | 91% | 54% | 14% | 1% | - | |
21 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 14% | |
22 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
23 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
24 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | |
25 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 94% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
26 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - |
27 | FU Qihan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 39% | 5% | |
28 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 99% | 81% | 31% | 5% | - | |
29 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
30 | HATZOGLU Isabella | 100% | 82% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
31 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | |
31 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - | |
33 | LEE Kaitlyn | 100% | 77% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
34 | SCARLETT Skye | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
35 | MENON Rhea | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
36 | HSIEH Sabrina | 100% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | |
37 | TANG Sophia | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
38 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | - | - | |
40 | MENDEZ Jalena | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | |
41 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
42 | BIENSTOCK Alexis | 100% | 97% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | |
43 | CHEN Miley | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.