Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | CHUNG Jinwoo | V V V V D D | V V V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 3 | SHIH William | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 3 | KUMBLA Samarth | D V V D V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 5 | BHARATHI Bhrugu S. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 7 | OTAKE Jared K. | D D V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 8 | YU Anders | D D D D V | V V V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 9 | LA ROSA Federico | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 10 | CHEN Alex J. | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | V V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 12 | MAO Connor | V V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 13 | LI Raphael C. | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | XIAO Anthony | V D V D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 15 | ZENG Lucas H. | V V D V D | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | LAO Scott E. | V D V D D D | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | LIN Dashiell | D V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 18 | SOOD Kishan S. | V V V V D V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 19 | DARIANO Noah G. | V V V V D V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 20 | CHIN Jason Y. | V D V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 21 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | V V D V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 22 | DANKAR Neel | V V V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 23 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 24 | WANG Andrew | V V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 25 | LAI Christopher W. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 26 | CHIN Julian | V V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 27 | TSANG Matthew K. | D V D D V V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 28 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | V D D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 29 | CURLEY Sebastian D. | D D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 30 | SOMERS Sean | D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 31 | TSAY Jeremy M. | D D V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 32 | LUH Ethan K. | D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 33 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | V D D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 34 | KO Tyler B. | D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 35 | DAVIS Christopher M. | V V D D D V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 36 | LUNA Emilio | D V V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 37 | MU Jeffrey | D D V V D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 38 | ELLIS Preston Y. | V D V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 39 | HOU Kenneth | V D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 40 | MILLER Duncan R. | V V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 41 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | D D D V D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 42 | HSIUNG Richie | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 43 | HE Bu Wei O. | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 44 | ZHANG Luke T. | D D V D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 45 | STIAGUN Nikita | D D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 46 | WU Conrad J. | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 47 | BARTELS Milo | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 48 | LIM Charles Q. | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 49 | XIAO EDWARD | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 50 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 51 | WICKBOLDT Eric | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 52 | WALKER Nathan A. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 53 | TAMHANKAR Neil | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.