Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WHITEHEAD Amir | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 2 | GISLER Benjamin B. | V D D V V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 3 | GAUTAM Vishnu | D D V V D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 3 | ZHENG zhe | V D V V D | V V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 5 | LE Vyn A. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | KLOTZ Isaiah | V V V D V | V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 7 | HOBSON Aaron K. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 8 | LEE Jacob | D V V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 9 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 10 | LIU Eric Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 12 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | PEGRAM Rafferty G. | D V V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 14 | MILLER Aidan A. | D D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | WOO Christian | D V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | KEE Andrew L. | V D D D D V | V V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 17 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | V V V V D V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 18 | CAI Oliver K. | V V V D V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 19 | WERWA Griffith | V V D D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 20 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | V D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 21 | ROUNTREE Rob | D V D V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 22 | BERNABE Rafael | D V V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 23 | DRESSEL Jet | V V D D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 24 | PRASANNA Advaith | V V D D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 25 | EMENHEISER Conrad | D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | SONG Bryan | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | DE COQUET Maximilian | V D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 28 | ZHAO Dylan L. | V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 29 | PITERBARG Maxim | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 30 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 31 | KLYCZEK Andrew | D D D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | WECHSLER Jacob | D D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
| 33 | VIVEROS Evan | D D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 34 | WANG Brayden | V V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 35 | PO Oliver | D D V D D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 | |
| 36 | DABNEY Justin | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 37 | THOMAS Richard E. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 38 | LIU Ryan | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 39 | VIVEROS Antonio | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.