Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 2 | LAI Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | |
| 3 | GEFELL Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 3 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 5 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 6 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% | |
| 7 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 8 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 38% | 7% | |
| 9 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
| 10 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% | |
| 11 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
| 12 | BRAR Sanjeet | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 13 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | 4% |
| 14 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% | |
| 17 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 18 | FORT David | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 21 | MURZYN III CJ | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 100% | 81% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | ZHU Charlie | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | TOZZI Massimo | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | AN Damon | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 29 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% | |
| 30 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | |
| 32 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | PANCHAL Shival | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 34 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 35 | STONE Christopher A. | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | FERBER Oliver E. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.