Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
| 2 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 3 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 3 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 5 | YANG Ziyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 6 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 31% | |
| 7 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 8 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
| 9 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 4% |
| 10 | SWORDS Evan F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 40% | |
| 12 | RHEE Ethan N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 13 | KOTOV Leonid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 15% |
| 14 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 8% | - | |
| 15 | JINICH Ilan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 16 | BAUER Hank E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | AVAKIAN Alec | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 19 | LO Konnor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 20 | LIM William J. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | XU Andrew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | |
| 23 | CAISSE Simon B. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | COVINGTON Max G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
| 25 | WONG James T. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 26 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 78% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | BULL Anderson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 31 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 32 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | REED Samuel J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 34 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 97% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BYON Julian | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | CHANIN Liam R. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 38 | RAJAN Advait | 100% | 98% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 9% | 1% | |
| 40 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 41 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 42 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | WOO Brian | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | KIM Evan | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 47 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 48 | CASSIM Shayan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 50 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 51 | PADOS Tamas | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | TAYLOR Christopher | 100% | 88% | 47% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | MENDOZA Noah | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.