Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
| 2 | WU Amelia | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 3 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 16% | |
| 3 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 49% | 21% | |
| 5 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% | |
| 6 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% | |
| 7 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 45% | |
| 8 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 9 | LEE Natasha | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 11% |
| 10 | BEI Karen | - | - | - | 2% | 27% | 71% | |
| 11 | MUN Brianna K. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 12 | CHANG Celine A. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 13 | WANG Nora | - | - | 1% | 8% | 41% | 50% | |
| 14 | BUSH emma | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 16 | LI Charlotte | 1% | 11% | 38% | 42% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | HAU Olivia | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 18 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 19 | ZHANG mickey | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | YOUNG Ashley | - | - | 2% | 18% | 62% | 18% | |
| 21 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | YAO Yilin | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | SHELIN Chelsea | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 24 | BARBARA Camille | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 26% | 4% | |
| 25 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 9% | |
| 26 | FELAND Alexandra | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 27 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 23% | 3% | |
| 29 | ENRILE Erica | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | HABERMAN Hailey | 5% | 29% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 32 | XU Katelyn | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | HSU Adele Y. | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 34 | GAO Judy | - | - | 4% | 23% | 51% | 23% | |
| 35 | WANG Angelina | 7% | 33% | 43% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | MEWES Katie M. | 9% | 41% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | LYU Jiaqi | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 54% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | GAUR Ishi | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 43 | MA Katelyn | 7% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | RUIZ Lusciana | 69% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 45 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 46 | CHA Eugenie | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 47 | LOUIE Sarah | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 20% | 45% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
| 49 | POON Desiree | 7% | 37% | 41% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | LEE Olivia | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 4% | 40% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 53 | LUH Mia P. | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | BOLES Amanda X. | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | LIN Ashley | 25% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 56 | SOOHOO Claire | 35% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | LEE Megan | 25% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.