Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
2 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
3 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 16% | |
3 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 21% | |
5 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% | |
6 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | |
7 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | |
8 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
9 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 11% |
10 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | |
11 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
12 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
13 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% | |
14 | BUSH emma | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
15 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
16 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 8% | - | |
17 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 12% | 1% | |
18 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
19 | ZHANG mickey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
20 | YOUNG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 18% | |
21 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
22 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | 2% |
23 | SHELIN Chelsea | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
24 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | 4% | |
25 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 9% | |
26 | FELAND Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
27 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | |
28 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | 3% | |
29 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
30 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 95% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | |
31 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
32 | XU Katelyn | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
33 | HSU Adele Y. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | - | |
34 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 23% | |
35 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 93% | 60% | 17% | 1% | - | |
36 | MEWES Katie M. | 100% | 91% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | |
37 | LYU Jiaqi | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
38 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
39 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
41 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
42 | GAUR Ishi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
43 | MA Katelyn | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
44 | RUIZ Lusciana | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
45 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% | 1% | |
46 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
47 | LOUIE Sarah | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
48 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | - | - | |
49 | POON Desiree | 100% | 93% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | |
50 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
51 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 100% | 96% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
52 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
53 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
54 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
55 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 75% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
56 | SOOHOO Claire | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
57 | LEE Megan | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.