Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 26% |
| 2 | WONG Cheryl | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 3 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 3 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 5 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
| 6 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 7 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 8 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 9 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 10 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 11 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | |
| 12 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 13 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 14 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 15 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% | |
| 16 | SUN Emily | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 18 | HWANG Alison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
| 19 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 20 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | LI Shuang | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 22 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | |
| 23 | PENG Serena | 100% | 89% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | MU Allison | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 26 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 28 | LEE Allison | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 29 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | NAM Cassie | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 31 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 90% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 43% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | PARK Leah | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | BALCE Cyril | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.