Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% | |
| 2 | GHAYALOD ansh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | |
| 3 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 3 | AVAKIAN Alec | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | |
| 5 | SWORDS Evan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% | |
| 5 | WU MENGKE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | |
| 7 | XU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 11% | |
| 8 | KIM Andrew H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | |
| 9 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 24% | |
| 10 | COOK Cole | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 11 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 12 | LO Konnor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 13 | LIM William J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 14 | SCHERER Max | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 15 | NIETO Titus P. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
| 17 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 18 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 31% | 3% | |
| 19 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 20 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 21 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | |
| 22 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | CAISSE Simon B. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 28 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 29 | BYON Julian | 100% | 95% | 64% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | RAJAN Advait | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | WOO Brian | 100% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | GUO Ethan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 88% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | PATRICO Peter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 35 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 86% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 37 | SOWERS Samuel | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | KIM Evan | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | GAINES Isaac M. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | CASSIM Shayan | 100% | 84% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | JOHNSON Kai | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.