Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
| 2 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 7% | 35% | 43% | 15% | - |
| 3 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 3 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
| 5 | WU Amelia | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 6 | YAO Yilin | - | 9% | 36% | 40% | 13% | 1% |
| 7 | CHEN Lefu | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 8 | BEI Karen | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
| 9 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 10 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% |
| 11 | LEE Olivia | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 12 | WANG Nora | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 34% | 1% |
| 13 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 45% | 17% |
| 14 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 15 | FELAND Alexandra | 3% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 5% | |
| 16 | KALE Anika A. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | GAO Judy | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 8% |
| 18 | LEE Natasha | - | 5% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% |
| 19 | LIN Ashley | 28% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 20 | LAN Alice S. | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% |
| 21 | YOUNG Ashley | - | 6% | 33% | 44% | 17% | - |
| 22 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 23 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 5% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 3% | |
| 24 | ZHANG mickey | 1% | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
| 25 | HABERMAN Hailey | 17% | 55% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | CAREY Michele S. | - | 9% | 36% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 27 | SMIK Leonie A. | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
| 28 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 11% | 48% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 11% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | LI Charlotte | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | BUSH emma | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 32 | ASSADOURIAN Nouneh | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 18% | 2% |
| 33 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | GAUR Ishi | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
| 35 | WANG Angelina | 17% | 55% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | POON Desiree | 34% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | FERNANDEZ Lucero | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LEE Megan | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.