Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% |
| 2 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | 15% | - |
| 3 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 3 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
| 5 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 6 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 90% | 54% | 15% | 1% |
| 7 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 8 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 9 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 10 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% |
| 11 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 12 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | 1% |
| 13 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 17% |
| 14 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 15 | FELAND Alexandra | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 5% | |
| 16 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 17 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 8% |
| 18 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 22% | 3% |
| 19 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 72% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 20 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
| 21 | YOUNG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | 17% | - |
| 22 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 23 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 3% | |
| 24 | ZHANG mickey | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% |
| 25 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 83% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | CAREY Michele S. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 54% | 15% | 1% |
| 27 | SMIK Leonie A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% |
| 28 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 89% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 30 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | BUSH emma | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 32 | ASSADOURIAN Nouneh | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 19% | 2% |
| 33 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | GAUR Ishi | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 83% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | POON Desiree | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | FERNANDEZ Lucero | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LEE Megan | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.