Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | IVE Isaac L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 11% | 1% |
2 | SHUR Yakov C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
3 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
3 | AU Marcus J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
5 | SMITH Zane A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
6 | CHON Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 8% | |
7 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 98% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
8 | BARRY Dominick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
9 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 13% | 2% | < 1% |
10 | DORRELL Connor I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | |
11 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
12 | CAI Kevin P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
13 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
14 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
15 | LIU Kirk D. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
16 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
17 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% |
18 | YULE Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 17% |
19 | SIVAGAR Leo | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
20 | PALLI Maximillian | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
21 | KIM PAUL | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
22 | LIU Felix | 100% | 99% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
23 | ANDERSON Elias W. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
24 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | RAKHIMI Marat T. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 33% | 7% | - | |
26 | KOH Tommy | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
27 | MILOSLAVSKY Jack | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
28 | SHOEMAKER Thomas P. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
29 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
30 | ZHANG Michael | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
31 | ARABACI Jack A. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
32 | DUONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 51% | 11% | 1% |
33 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
34 | MILEY Nick N. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | KENNY Oliver R. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | ATHAVALE Pranav | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
37 | LEE Trevor | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
38 | LOUIE Jason | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
39 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
40 | PELAYO Raphael | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.