Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOORE Jeremy S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% |
| 2 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 3 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 3 | ROSE Ben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 9% |
| 5 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 14% |
| 6 | DELAP Rylan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 7 | PARACKA Eric D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 8 | LAUSI Patrick M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 15% |
| 9 | VIVEROS Evan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 24% | 3% |
| 11 | WEBB Jacob T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 40% | 2% |
| 11 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | RUDOLPH Max B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | 4% |
| 14 | WANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 5% |
| 15 | SHAJI Karthik | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 5% |
| 16 | MAXWELL CJ F. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | QIAN Zhiyan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | BOUIE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 20 | LIU Darren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 10% | - |
| 21 | HUSSAIN Mustafa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 22 | DAVIS Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 23 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | 1% |
| 24 | YOON Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 25 | BOGART Drake R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
| 26 | CAMPBELL Justin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | THOMAS Richard E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | VIVEROS Antonio | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | ANDERSON Sidney E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 31 | MADDOX Lacey E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | DICICCO Liam | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | GOEBEL Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 34 | RODRIGUEZ Beni A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 35 | SHEPARD Seth | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | EVANGELISTI Gabriele | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | HUYNH Jennifer | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | KHAN Saher | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 39 | MAXWELL Austin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 40 | HAWTHORNE Lauren | 100% | 89% | 52% | 13% | - | - | - |
| 40 | MCARTHUR Kemp | 100% | 88% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | MILLETTE Brigid A. | 100% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | BOCKSNICK John Robert | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LEE Chaewoong | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | BUTFILOSKI Cooper B. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | SPEED Rebecca | 100% | 65% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 47 | HARTMANS Jae | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 48 | THU John | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | HUFFMAN Taeli | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | JORDAN Christopher | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | KENYON Briella | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | WHITE Andrew | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | BOTKIN Elizabeth | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | GRANT Makeana | 100% | 94% | 62% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | WOEHRMAN Madeline | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | HUGHES Kayla | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.